Error in commodity data?

[nebujvs]

Hi

There are missing of O, H,L data in scrips like Nikkel ,Zinc, copper etc


Pls care it

JV

[Prashanth]

Hi

There are missing of O, H,L data in scrips like Nikkel ,Zinc, copper etc


Pls care it

JV

Which day's data?

[ruchin_mittal]

Dear Prashanth Sir,
CEOD Data for 18th sept 09 is wrong .
Copper data for Nov and Feb are Interchanged.
Also Crude oil data is wrong .
Please Check the files .
thanks
Ruchin

[subhas801]

yes, It seems that data has been uploaded by wrong method as Copper-I data are interchanged with Copper-II, So as to Guarseed, Jute, Lead, Nickle,SilverM,Soyabean, Wheat and Zinc of MCX of 18-09-09

Plz re-upload correct file.


Subhas Mishra

[Prashanth]

Dear Prashanth Sir,
CEOD Data for 18th sept 09 is wrong .
Copper data for Nov and Feb are Interchanged.
Also Crude oil data is wrong .
Please Check the files .
thanks
Ruchin

Sorry for the error. The same has been rectified and the file replaced.

Regards

Prashanth

[subhas801]

I have re downloaded the file and found that error still exists in it e.g. see Copper-I



Subhas Mishra

[Prashanth]

I have re downloaded the file and found that error still exists in it e.g. see Copper-I



Subhas Mishra

No. Error has been rectified. Am sending the file to your mail Id just in case due to temporary cache, the same file got accessed.

Prashanth

[subhas801]

Thanks




Subhas Mishra

[ruchin_mittal]

Dear Sir ,
Where is the CEOD data for Monday 21st sept 09 - Its shown in red i.e, non existent data . MCX was open in Evening Session....????

[nebujvs]

Which day's data?

Hi Prashanth

Sorry for the delay in replay, Pls find the chart with no H,L for copper/zinc/nickel


http://www.4shared.com/file/134840052/33f42667/COPELCMUM-I.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/134840053/44f316f1/COPPER-I.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/134840047/5a85e3a9/NICCATMUM-I.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/134840048/ca3afe38/NICKEL-I.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/134840049/bd3dceae/TIN-I.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/134840050/ddfa474b/zinc_I.html


JV

[nebujvs]

Hi Prashanth

Sorry for the delay in replay, Pls find the chart with no H,L for copper/zinc/nickel


http://www.4shared.com/file/134840052/33f42667/COPELCMUM-I.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/134840053/44f316f1/COPPER-I.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/134840047/5a85e3a9/NICCATMUM-I.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/134840048/ca3afe38/NICKEL-I.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/134840049/bd3dceae/TIN-I.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/134840050/ddfa474b/zinc_I.html


JV

Hi Prasanth

I found out the error . these scrips have same Ticker name in both files (in both NCDEX & MCX) so it will overwrite when we feed.

So how can I over come this challenge , Creating separate database for each Ex. or rename ticker name in each file and reload?

Iam very grateful if any one give me the correct database till date.

Thank you

Pls find file in which I marked the same ticker names on 23rd sep 2009
http://www.4shared.com/file/135237980/4f9ecef2/NCDEX-mcx.html

JV

[Prashanth]

Hi Prasanth

I found out the error . these scrips have same Ticker name in both files (in both NCDEX & MCX) so it will overwrite when we feed.

So how can I over come this challenge , Creating separate database for each Ex. or rename ticker name in each file and reload?

Iam very grateful if any one give me the correct database till date.

Thank you

Pls find file in which I marked the same ticker names on 23rd sep 2009
http://www.4shared.com/file/135237980/4f9ecef2/NCDEX-mcx.html

JV

Yes. I myself stumbled upon it recently.

One way to overcome from our side would be to have a prefix / affix of exchange name to differentiate. But that would create new tickers and its a tough task to merge everything into the new symbols.

Right now the only easy way to deal with it would be to have seperate databases for MCX and NCDEX. If you are using AB (Latest Beta Version), I can provide updated databases for the same.

[nebujvs]

Yes. I myself stumbled upon it recently.

One way to overcome from our side would be to have a prefix / affix of exchange name to differentiate. But that would create new tickers and its a tough task to merge everything into the new symbols.

Right now the only easy way to deal with it would be to have seperate databases for MCX and NCDEX. If you are using AB (Latest Beta Version), I can provide updated databases for the same.

Iam using Ami ver 5.01.2, pls share the databse.

I think prefixing Ex. code good idea so that we can understand which ex. deal that scrip.


If you can give some time, I can manage the merging to new symble and upload the same to all here.

Chears

[Prashanth]

Iam using Ami ver 5.01.2, pls share the databse.

I think prefixing Ex. code good idea so that we can understand which ex. deal that scrip.


If you can give some time, I can manage the merging to new symble and upload the same to all here.

Chears

Amibroker has changed the database from version 5.25.0. Database I use now is NOT compatible with earlier versions.

Depending upon system processor speed, I feel that even if you create new databases and import the historical data, should not take too long.

[kunaljs99]

again copper nickle open high low close data missing

[nebujvs]

again copper nickle open high low close data missing

Kunal

Try to feed 2 files one by one. ie first NCDEX then MCX if you are using single database.

[nebujvs]

Hi

I uploaded the corrected Database of MCX AND NCDEX for Ami 5.10.2 Up to 26th Sep 2009

Happy trading

http://www.4shared.com/file/135991556/1f555b50/MCXNCDEX_DATABASE_upto_260909.html