Sector Performance on 11th June 2009

June 11th, 2009

Sector Performance on 11th June 2009

Ticker % Change

~Telecom Service Prv 4.82%

~Sugar 3.50%

~Auto Tractors 2.81%

~Fertilizers 2.15%

~Cigarettes 1.89%

~Abrasives 1.37%

~Textiles - Products 1.37%

~Alluminium 1.21%

~Leather Prod 0.90%

~Air Conditioners 0.83%

~Paints/Varnish 0.55%

~Tires 0.51%

~Chlor Alk/Soda 0.50%

~Steel - Large 0.49%

~Fin. Housing 0.18%

~Pers.Care Ind 0.13%

~Engineering (Turnkey) 0.07%

~Transport - Air 0.07%

~Cycles 0.06%

~Cable - Power 0.04%

~Mould Luggage 0.04%

~Banks (Private) 0.01%

~Pharmaceuticals 0.00%

~Cable-Telephone -0.07%

~Un-Classified -0.09%

~Packaging -0.11%

~Txt-Spg/Syb/Bln -0.15%

~Glass -0.19%

~Txt-Cott.Blend -0.21%

~Elec Components -0.27%

~Petrochemicals -0.29%

~Bearings -0.30%

~Healthcare -0.30%

~Food Proc Ind. -0.35%

~Auto Ancillaries -0.39%

~Mining / Miner -0.40%

~Finance & Inv -0.43%

~Stock Brokerage -0.51%

~Auto & Truck Manufacture -0.56%

~Elec - Consumer -0.59%

~Plastic Products -0.59%

~Comp SW Conv -0.62%

~Detrgnt/Intermdt -0.66%

~Telecom Equipment -0.67%

~Chemicals -0.68%

~Auto 2/3Wheels -0.71%

~Hotels -0.73%

~Engineering -0.81%

~Engines -0.98%

~Entr Sw Media -0.99%

~Miscellaneous -1.00%

~Dyes & Pigments -1.01%

~Cast & Forgings -1.10%

~Paper -1.10%

~Tea -1.10%

~Txt-Processing -1.12%

~Ceramic Tiles -1.15%

~Steel Pig / Sponge Iron -1.27%

~Shipping -1.29%

~Cement -1.33%

~Txt-Manmade -1.36%

~Electr Graphite -1.39%

~Refrac/Intermedi -1.54%

~Cars (Auto) -1.55%

~Compres/Dril Eqp -1.63%

~Comp Sw Med -1.68%

~Diver -1.71%

~Breweries -1.72%

~Refineries -1.75%

~Computer Education -1.82%

~Power Gener -1.83%

~Solvent Extract -1.93%

~Electr WeldiEq -1.94%

~Industr -2.04%

~Pumps -2.16%

~Banks (PSU) -2.30%

~Trading -2.61%

~Travel Agencies -2.67%

~Comp Sw Large -2.75%

~Dry Cells -2.76%

~TranLineTow/Eqpt -2.78%

~Electric Equipment -2.88%

~Steel Med/Small -3.04%

~Construction -3.06%

~Txt-Machinery -3.52%

~Print & Stnary -3.55%

~Txt-Composite -3.56%

~Photo & Allied -4.05%

~Fasteners -4.16%

~Aquaculture -4.20%

~Pesticides -4.22%

~Recre/AmuseParks -4.90%

~Couriers -7.03%

Leaders & Laggards, Sector Performance on 08th June 2009

June 8th, 2009

Leaders & Laggards among Sectors for 8th June 2009.

- Prashanth

Ticker

% Change

~Aquaculture

4.23%

~Abrasives

2.36%

~Pers.Care Ind

0.36%

~Pesticides

0.26%

~Comp Sw Large

0.25%

~Glass

-0.05%

~Electric Equipment

-0.20%

~Auto 2/3Wheels

-0.89%

~Trading

-1.51%

~Txt-Cott.Blend

-1.76%

~Dry Cells

-1.91%

~Sugar

-1.96%

~Tires

-1.98%

~Cable - Power

-2.14%

~Cars (Auto)

-2.18%

~Refineries

-2.20%

~Air Conditioners

-2.24%

~Fin. Housing

-2.50%

~Travel Agencies

-2.51%

~Miscellaneous

-2.52%

~Paints/Varnish

-2.53%

~Industr

-2.63%

~Dyes & Pigments

-2.69%

~Engineering

-2.84%

~Recre/AmuseParks

-2.93%

~Cement

-2.99%

~Un-Classified

-3.00%

~Electr WeldiEq

-3.06%

~Steel Med/Small

-3.30%

~Steel Pig / Sponge Iron

-3.30%

~Auto Tractors

-3.34%

~Finance & Inv

-3.40%

~Petrochemicals

-3.40%

~Cable-Telephone

-3.43%

~Textiles - Products

-3.48%

~Chemicals

-3.51%

~Txt-Spg/Syb/Bln

-3.52%

~Elec Components

-3.53%

~Telecom Service Prv

-3.54%

~Cast & Forgings

-3.63%

~Banks (Private)

-3.65%

~Ceramic Tiles

-3.64%

~Pharmaceuticals

-3.68%

~Auto Ancillaries

-3.70%

~Photo & Allied

-3.73%

~Cigarettes

-3.79%

~Healthcare

-3.85%

~Mining / Miner

-3.94%

~Tea

-4.04%

~Engines

-4.09%

~Comp Sw Med

-4.10%

~Hotels

-4.10%

~Packaging

-4.32%

~Alluminium

-4.36%

~Food Proc Ind.

-4.38%

~Leather Prod

-4.47%

~Txt-Processing

-4.59%

~Paper

-4.66%

~Electr Graphite

-4.67%

~Power Gener

-4.72%

~Auto & Truck Manufacture

-4.89%

~Plastic Products

-4.99%

~Telecom Equipment

-5.01%

~Diver

-5.17%

~Couriers

-5.24%

~Elec - Consumer

-5.31%

~Print & Stnary

-5.35%

~Txt-Manmade

-5.37%

~Txt-Machinery

-5.45%

~Construction

-5.49%

~TranLineTow/Eqpt

-5.64%

~Fertilizers

-5.68%

~Banks (PSU)

-5.72%

~Breweries

-5.75%

~Detrgnt/Intermdt

-5.78%

~Refrac/Intermedi

-5.82%

~Cycles

-5.86%

~Pumps

-5.89%

~Computer Education

-5.90%

~Comp SW Conv

-5.95%

~Compres/Dril Eqp

-6.02%

~Solvent Extract

-6.08%

~Fasteners

-6.17%

~Engineering (Turnkey)

-6.18%

~Bearings

-6.45%

~Shipping

-6.65%

~Mould Luggage

-7.03%

~Entr Sw Media

-7.32%

~Stock Brokerage

-7.49%

~Steel - Large

-7.61%

~Txt-Composite

-9.18%

~Chlor Alk/Soda

-9.56%

~Transport - Air

-11.65%

Leaders & Laggards, Sector Performance on 08th June 2009

June 8th, 2009

Performance of various Sectors / Industries on 8th June 2009

Ticker % Change ~Aquaculture 4.23% ~Abrasives 2.36% ~Pers.Care Ind 0.36% ~Pesticides 0.26% ~Comp Sw Large 0.25% ~Glass -0.05% ~Electric Equipment -0.20% ~Auto 2/3Wheels -0.89% ~Trading -1.51% ~Txt-Cott.Blend -1.76% ~Dry Cells -1.91% ~Sugar -1.96% ~Tires -1.98% ~Cable - Power -2.14% ~Cars (Auto) -2.18% ~Refineries -2.20% ~Air Conditioners -2.24% ~Fin. Housing -2.50% ~Travel Agencies -2.51% ~Miscellaneous -2.52% ~Paints/Varnish -2.53% ~Industr -2.63% ~Dyes & Pigments -2.69% ~Engineering -2.84% ~Recre/AmuseParks -2.93% ~Cement -2.99% ~Un-Classified -3.00% ~Electr WeldiEq -3.06% ~Steel Med/Small -3.30% ~Steel Pig / Sponge Iron -3.30% ~Auto Tractors -3.34% ~Finance & Inv -3.40% ~Petrochemicals -3.40% ~Cable-Telephone -3.43% ~Textiles - Products -3.48% ~Chemicals -3.51% ~Txt-Spg/Syb/Bln -3.52% ~Elec Components -3.53% ~Telecom Service Prv -3.54% ~Cast & Forgings -3.63% ~Banks (Private) -3.65% ~Ceramic Tiles -3.64% ~Pharmaceuticals -3.68% ~Auto Ancillaries -3.70% ~Photo & Allied -3.73% ~Cigarettes -3.79% ~Healthcare -3.85% ~Mining / Miner -3.94% ~Tea -4.04% ~Engines -4.09% ~Comp Sw Med -4.10% ~Hotels -4.10% ~Packaging -4.32% ~Alluminium -4.36% ~Food Proc Ind. -4.38% ~Leather Prod -4.47% ~Txt-Processing -4.59% ~Paper -4.66% ~Electr Graphite -4.67% ~Power Gener -4.72% ~Auto & Truck Manufacture -4.89% ~Plastic Products -4.99% ~Telecom Equipment -5.01% ~Diver -5.17% ~Couriers -5.24% ~Elec - Consumer -5.31% ~Print & Stnary -5.35% ~Txt-Manmade -5.37% ~Txt-Machinery -5.45% ~Construction -5.49% ~TranLineTow/Eqpt -5.64% ~Fertilizers -5.68% ~Banks (PSU) -5.72% ~Breweries -5.75% ~Detrgnt/Intermdt -5.78% ~Refrac/Intermedi -5.82% ~Cycles -5.86% ~Pumps -5.89% ~Computer Education -5.90% ~Comp SW Conv -5.95% ~Compres/Dril Eqp -6.02% ~Solvent Extract -6.08% ~Fasteners -6.17% ~Engineering (Turnkey) -6.18% ~Bearings -6.45% ~Shipping -6.65% ~Mould Luggage -7.03% ~Entr Sw Media -7.32% ~Stock Brokerage -7.49% ~Steel - Large -7.61% ~Txt-Composite -9.18% ~Chlor Alk/Soda -9.56% ~Transport - Air -11.65%

When to make money?

May 4th, 2009

A Morning Report by a Share broking firm caught my eye due to the following view,

<Quote> The rally is a typical bear market rally. One should not play on the upside. Rather, it would be prudent to utilize the bounce back to lighten positions. <UnQuote>

Now, its common knowledge that we are in a Bear Market territory on long term charts and hence any rally can be seen as a Bear Rally. But, would it be wise to not even trade it (long side). Afterall, bear market rallies provide a very stong oppurtunity both timewise and amountwise as compared to even Bull Market Rallies.?

For example, Nifty over the last 3 days has rallied around 225 points which is around 9% from the low of 9th March. This kind of strong rally is seldom available in the mark

Mechanical Trading System - Basics - Part One

February 16th, 2009
Investopedia defines is as?A trading system is simply a group of specific rules, or parameters, that determine entry and exit points for a given equity. These points, known as signals, are often marked on a chart in real time and prompt the immediate execution of a trade.
So, its important that we devise rules that hold for itself. But before that, one has to understand that there is no holy grail which means that you have to compromise some thing for other and there is no system that shall work in every market scenario.
So, how do we go about Building a Trading System. Well, thats the big thing. For a start, you have to decide on a couple of things,
1. Charting Software you would use -> Any Trading system you build will have to be in the language the system understands. Also, for visual effect, its always better to have a charting software though the same can be done by using MS-Excel as well.
2. Time Frame: This is one of the most important parameters. I for example trade using 5 Mins, 15 Mins & 60 Min Bars. For my style of trading and my Risk Profile, I am comfortable using the same. But, shorter time frame means that you need to constantly monitor and if trading is part time (with a full time job on hand), this is a not a time frame one should venture into.
3. Market you want to trade upon: Many people express the sentiment that a good trading system should work in every market. I believe this is a very wrong concept due to a huge number of things which I shall not go into, but believe me, its always better to concentrate on a few rather than try to trade everything.?
For example, Volatility of Nifty is high when compared to Volatility of S&P (US) hence what works for US Markets may or may not work for Nifty and vice versa.
Now that we know the essentials,lets move to the next step.
Lets write a simple Trading System
A Simple Trading System can be a Moving Average Crossover
What are the factors to look at when testing. The following list is just some of them and are things I generally check.
1. Draw Down: This is the most important metric in my opinion. Trading Systems (TS) that are sensitive have lower DD’s than systems that have lower sensitivity. Ofcourse, higher sensitivity means, higher number of whipsaws. So, a trade off all the same. The metric that has to be looked at is either CAR / MDD or RAR / MDD. Lower the better since a 20% DD on paper has no impact whereas if your trade is down even 10% when trading using real money, it has a huge Psychological impact.
2. Profit Factor: This metric shows the net profitability of the system. Most systems (good) have a higher number of loss trades than profit trades, but still are able to give out a fairly high profit factor which means that even if you have suffered a couple of whipsaws, the system will recover everything once there is a good trend (for Trend following systems).
3. Equity Curve: Most systems allow one to draw the Equity Curve which shows how the starting capital would have performed over the course of the period. Too smooth a equity curve will in all?probability?be the result of over optimization which results in a phenomenon we call Curve fitting. While the result looks good on paper, again, when the same is used with real money, Self Destruction is guaranteed.
4. Exposure: Too low a exposure means that the system is most of the time in cash and does not make sense.?
5. K-Ratio / Sortino Ratio: For more info about these,please google them, but they are usefull metrics that show as to whether your profits are distributed across or just a few trades account for most of the profits (which is bad). While its said that a K-Ratio of more than 1 is good, I have never been able to get any higher than 0.25, so not sure if 1 is really possible. But, do eyeball the trades to see as to whether some trades could really have been taken.
Ok, I think that the above information is suffice and for more, well google is always on hand :)
Lets move to Optimization.
What is Optimization. Optimization is trying to determine what works best or rather what worked best in ?history and trying to see if the same can be used in future as well to get similar returns.
When people optimize, they generally tend to look for the best profit making factor. That is entirely wrong since peaks constitute less than 10% of the total available trading. Trying to catch the peak will just result in a trading system which shows great returns on back test but performs?medicorely in real time. What I am trying to say is that your system should not try to catch the 10% return that comes occasionally but try to catch say the 5% return that comes most of the time. The best performance in back test may not hence be the factor to choose.
To better understand that, one needs to look at a 3D Graph. AmiBroker provides such a thing where you can see the peaks as well as the valleys and?Plateaus.

To ensure that your system is not curve fitted, its essential that you run a Walk Forward optimization to see how it would have performed in reality without the benefit of hind sight.?

AmiBroker defines WFO as such,

The automatic Walk forward test is a system design and validation technique in which you optimize the parameter values on a past segment of market data (”in-sample”), then verify the performance of the system by testing it forward in time on data following the optimization segment (”out-of-sample”). You evaluate the system based on how well it performs on the test data (”out-of-sample”), not the data it was optimized on. The process can be repeated over subsequent time segments.
I think that I have covered all things that need to be covered. In my next post, I shall post a sample trading system and discuss the metrics as well as things that I have coded.?
Brickbats / Queries very much welcomed.
Cheers

Prashanth

Does two wrongs make a right?

January 14th, 2009

Continuing with the Satyam saga, voices are now being heard which seem to suggest that Satyam would have survived if the merger plan with Maytas was carried forward instead of being stumped at the start. After all, the argument goes that since Satyam had no cash, atleast it would have assets on its books and all would have been hale and healthy.

Is that so simple? First of all, it?s in hindsight from which we know that Satyam had no cash on its books. I personally don?t believe that the entire money was fictitious and there has to be some amount of siphoning which has happened since hiding hundreds and then thousands of crores from everyone is not a small thing and one that has according to the confession lasted nearly 7 years. One also has to remember that Maytas itself it seems became aggressive over the last couple of years. Hence, it would have to be more of siphoning than just cooking the books on long term.

Coming back to the topic, there are two things that I personally dislike about the statement of Satyam having been saved if Maytas was allowed to be merged. First is the fact that even now, no one knows who did the valuation for Maytas and more importantly Maytas Properties. Hence, one can never be sure if those assets are in themselves real or just worthless papers.

Second and more importantly that would have allowed the Raju?s to go scot free. Afterall, if property markets would not have fallen, Maytas Properties would not have been in trouble and if Maytas Properties were not onto hard times, the Raju?s could have just filled back the deficit from their profits and no one would be the wiser.

While I applaud the move to dissolve the old board and come up with a new board, I am not sure what the current board?s intentions are. I for one believe that if they are really looking at safe guarding the interest?s of its employees, the best way forward will be to have a fire-sale of every domain they are working with the agreement being that the persons working on those project will be taken aboard by the company buying the domains verticals. This will have two positive impacts. One, customers will be confident that there will be no gap in the service they are being provided right now and Secondly, the morale of the Employees will be boosted.

Instead, if the board tries to revive the company, it will not only be a action in futility, but also open a Pandora?s box about government intervention in private entities. Afterall, thousands of companies go bust every year, hundreds of employees are thrown out, what is so special about Satyam other than the numbers would be a question to ask.

A very happy Shankranti and Pongal to all readers.

Prashanth

Whose interest does LIC represent?

January 8th, 2009
?

LIC yesterday issued a Press Release stating and I quote,
“We have a 4.34 per cent stake in Satyam Computer Services Ltd. We have no plan to sell our stake, at least in the short-term.? He said LIC will play a positive role in helping the company and its employees”
If LIC was a Private Body, one could care less about how they go about doing things. But LIC has invested in Satyam using Money from Public (LIC Money Plus it seems has quite a big investment). Instead of being answerable to the public, they seem to feel that by not selling, they can be of support to the company. Ofcourse, helping the employees is a good deed. But, if they do not sell and the company still fails, would it matter for anyone except for those who have invested.
This is not a individual instance but has happened repeatedly. Infact, any company which has low promoter interest does not worry if Institutions have a high stake since they are sure that in case of any hostile takeover, the Institutions will support the management rather than the newbie.
I believe this attitude is changing, but we still have a fair way to go. The time taken by them to take decisions is so lengthy and messy that when faced with situations like this, they tend to remain motionless instead of taking decisive action since no one wants to be blamed if things do not go as panned.
To be fair to LIC, a whole lot of FII’s who have invested in Satyam have done nothing yesterday. Not sure what they are waiting for, but just a cursory look at his?letter tells that they have no money (the supposed $1+ Billion Reserves).?Add to it, the claim that their Net Profit Margin is 3%… oops, now how did they get to so low NPM’s. Since fund managers are supposed to know on the back of their hand, details about every company they have substantial investments in, seems a surprise that many of them were sitting still seeing their investments meltdown by the minute.
Just a few thoughts.
Prashanth

?

?

?

Supports & Resistances

December 21st, 2008

While Technical Analysis is not based purely on Supports & Resistances, media highlighting has made it look as if S&R is the only thing there is to be learnt in Technical Analysis. This is because when a Analyst provides Support & Resistance levels, he can claim to be right no matter how the market has moved.

Unfortunately, trading is never so easy. Unless you understand why X level is support and Y level is Resistance and test it on a Historical basis, one can never be sure as to how feasible it is to trade. Also, a thing to be kept in mind is that what values you use should be determined by your style of Investing / Trading. For example, a Long Term Investor may very well look at longer moving averages ? 100 or 200 for instance whereas for a short term investor those may not be ideally best suited for him.

A short-term trader is more concerned what shall happen in the next few hours / days rather than whether the market will hit a new high or make a new low in the next couple of years. Hence it amazes me that Analysts on TV without caring for what segment of Investors they cater too just jump around giving all sorts of levels.

Many brokerage houses provide Technical Analysis reports where the main focus is on S&R using Pivots ? R1, R2 & S1, S2. Unfortunately these are not only primitive in approach, but also lack any value. Some days, these might prove correct and some days wrong, but since market volatility ensures that one or the other levels are constantly reached / breached, there is no particular advantage in using these sort of levels.

The other point to consider is the probability of a particular level to act as support ? resistance. As we know, reason for some levels acting as good support ? resistance levels is due to the conjunction of forces of demand and supply. At supports, falling prices are halted if strong demand occurs and vice versa. Hence, it is essential that we understand what works in what time frame and then try and devise ways to take advantage of the same.

I hear a lot of persons ridiculing these S&R levels. Unfortunately, most of them aren?t quite aware of the reasoning and logic behind it and are misled by half truths and by the fact that most Analysts on Television give away levels as if markets are bound by them. Support & Resistance levels are just a reference point, nothing more, nothing less. It hence left to us, Traders - Investors to figure out how to use the same.

?Take Care. Happy Trading

Prashanth

Satyam buys Mytas

December 16th, 2008

Satyam Computers inspite being among the Top IT companies has never commanded the valuation that its peers like TCS, Wipro & HCL command. This is majorly attributed to lower levels of lower margins, lack of transparency, lower level of corporate governance among others.

Satyam today has provided one hard reason as to how easy they can take the public for a ride. Satyam Computers is an IT firm with pure focus on Information Technology. The last time they ventured into a Buyout was with Sify which burnt them bad. They got out of Sify after quite a few years unable to provide either direction or the funds needed to sustain the company. Today, it seems to have committed total hara kiri by taking over a company floated by their family members.

Maytas Infrastructure is not a small company. It made a IPO in Sept 2007. For the half year ended Sep 2008, it had Sales of 737 Crores and Net Profit of 36 Crores which gives it a Net Profit Margin of around 20%. Not very bad, but one has to consider that till not, Infra companies have quite a order backlog but are short of cash to execute many of them. How many will survive to the next decade is a questions that has not many answers.

The name Mytas itself is reverse of satyaM. Maytas is in the Infrastructure area, which over the last few months has taken a heavy toll in terms of loss of contracts, risk due to escalation of costs, non-availability of finance among others. Infact, save for Mytas, most Infra company stocks have performed very poorly on the market. Why Mytas has not fallen so much is a question to be asked now that Satyam is buying out the promoters (who are promoters of Satyam itself).

Just read that CLSA has downgraded Satyam and I expect further downgrades / Sell Calls down the lane. Sterlite tried to do another kind of trick (Demerging and consequent increase in promoter stake at virtually no cost). Stock was hit quite badly.
Though Sterlite cancelled the whole transaction, it did not make much of a impact as FII’s and DII’s sold stock anyway.

With Satyam nearly exhausting all its Cash into this venture, it will start facing difficulties in its core business itself since it cannot grow in-organically and will not have the strength to sustain a elongated downturn if it happens.

Prashanth

Bernard Madoff

December 15th, 2008

I had not heard that name, you may not have too until he did this. What is so interesting about?him is that he unlike many firms that screw?small people with these ponzi schemes managed to screw the biggest and some of the best including firms like Nomura, BNP Paribas among others.

What?s more surprising is that this scheme was not run for a few days or a few months but instead lasted years together with not many picking up even a whiff of a scam. That?s very surprising to say the least because Hedge Funds / Big HNI’s have dedicated persons for Risk Management and a sustained month after month positive market with very low volatility is just no possible.

Most of them will now claim to be misled, but the fact would remain that they were Greedy when they should have been fearful (yeah, yeah, you have heard that before :) ). There is never a strategy that can give you sustained positive performance day after day, month after month and year after year.

This is because, every strategy has its time limits. If a strategy is yielding freebies, it will provide the returns until a lot more money uses the same strategy / technique at which point, risk outmatches return.

The Madoff strategy was simple in itself. He claimed to use what he called and I quote “A split-strike conversion strategy using proprietary ‘black box’ quantitative techniques to minimize portfolio volatility?. What he was actually trading was using simple Collar Strategy where returns are good when Volatility is low and Trend is Bullish. Once trend starts being a bear, you can hardly make money in this strategy since your stocks will fall more than what your Sold Call Option can sustain and hence giving negative returns. Infact, most of the time, unless a bit of bias is taken {By way of selling a Deep Out of the money Calls to ensure more gains when stock moves up or purchasing Deep Out of the Money Puts to ensure small investment in the Put Options}.

What can we conclude from above? Well, there is no Holy Grail and if something is not believable, it may not be true in itself as well.

Take Care

Prashanth